Infaunal communities of Baltic upper circalittoral sand not dominated by bivalves
Quick facts
| Red List habitat type | code BAL54 |
|---|---|
| Threat status | |
| Europe | Least Concern |
| EU | Least Concern |
| Relation to |
|
| Source | European Red List habitat factsheet |
| European Red List of habitats reports | |
| European Red List of habitats (Excel table) |
Summary
This habitat occurs on Baltic aphotic bottoms with at least 90% coverage of sand according to the HELCOM HUB classification. Sessile/semi-sessile epibenthic macrofauna are generally not present while the biomass of infauna is typically dominated by polychaetes, crustaceans, or insect larvae. This habitat is encountered in sand typically at depths below 30m in moderate to high energy exposure areas. Three associated biotopes have been identified variously characterised by infaunal polychates (Pygospio elegans, Marenzelleria spp. and Hediste diversicolor), crustaceans (Monoporeia affinis and Saduria entomon) or midge larvae (Chironomidae). These species groups constitute at least 50% of the biomass.
Indicators of quality:
Both biotic and abiotic indicators have been used to describe marine habitat quality. These include: the presence of characteristic species as well as those which are sensitive to the pressures the habitat may face; water quality parameters; levels of exposure to particular pressure, and more integrated indices which describe habitat structure and function, such as trophic index, or successional stages of development in habitats that have a natural cycle of change overtime. There are no commonly agreed indicators of quality for this habitat, although particular parameters may have been set in certain situations e.g. protected features within Natura 2000 sites, where reference values have been determined and applied on a location-specific basis. Diversity, abundance and biomass of fauna are potential indicators of quality.
Threat status
Synthesis of Red List assessment
The overall assessment for this EUNIS level 4 habitat has been based on the HELCOM (2013) assessments for the associated HELCOM HUB biotopes. Draft assessments were derived using a weighted approach whereby the HELCOM assessment outcomes were assigned a score. This was averaged across the relevant biotopes. The outcomes were reviewed by Baltic experts to reach a final conclusion. HELCOM (2013) assessed the three biotopes AB.J3M4, AB.J3N1 and AB.J3P1 as Least Concern (A1). Current expert opinion is that because the habitat is considered to be stable and has a wide geographical distribution it should be assessed as Least Concern for both the EU 28 and EU 28+.
| EU | |
| Red List Category | Red List Criteria |
| Least Concern | - |
| Europe | |
| Red List Category | Red List Criteria |
| Least Concern | - |
Confidence in the assessment
Pressures and threats
- No threats or pressures
- No threats or pressures
Habitat restoration potential
Trends in extent |
|
Average current trend in quantity |
|
Stable ![]() |
Stable ![]() |
| EU28 | EU28+ |
Trends in quality |
|
Average current trend in quality |
|
Stable ![]() |
Stable ![]() |
| EU28 | EU28+ |
Conservation and management needs
List of conservation and management needs
- No measures
- No measures needed for the conservation of the habitat/species
Distribution
Geographic occurrence and trends
| Seas | Present or presence uncertain | Current area of habitat (Km2) | Recent trend in quantity (last 50 years) | Recent trend in quality (last 50 years) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baltic Proper | Present | Unknown | Stable | Stable |
| Belt Sea | ||||
| Gulf of Bothnia | ||||
| Gulf of Finland | ||||
| Gulf of Riga | ||||
| The Sound |
Extent of Occurrence, Area of Occupancy and habitat area
| Extent of Occurrence (EOO) (Km2) | Area of Occupancy (AOO) | Current estimated Total Area | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EU28 | >50,000 | Unknown | Unknown | This habitat is present in all the Baltic sub-basins therefore EOO is likely to exceed 50,000km2 |
| EU28+ | Unknown | Unknown | This habitat is present in all the Baltic sub-basins therefore EOO is likely to exceed 50,000km2 |
EOO = the area (km2) of the envelope around all occurrences of a habitat (calculated by a minimum convex polygon).

