Sparse epibenthic community of Baltic upper circalittoral muddy sediment
Quick facts
Red List habitat type | code BAL59 |
---|---|
Threat status | |
Europe | Endangered |
EU | Endangered |
Relation to |
|
Source | European Red List habitat factsheet |
European Red List of habitats reports | |
European Red List of habitats (Excel table) |
Summary
This Baltic Sea benthic habitat occurs in the aphotic zone where there is at least 90% coverage of muddy sediment according to the HELCOM HUB classification. Sessile/semi-sessile epibenthic fauna is present but covers less than 10% of the seabed. One associated biotope has been identified: ‘Baltic aphotic muddy sediment dominated by seapens’ (AB.H2T1). This is characterized by conspicuous populations of seapens that usually live scattered over the sea floor but usually cover less than 10% of the muddy surface. It occurs typically from 15 to 200 meters depth in low to moderate energy exposure classes in the highest salinity regions of the Baltic (up to 23 psu in The Sound). These deep water communities are crucially important to the function of the ecosystem. They provide food and shelter for many other species, including commercially important fish.
Indicators of quality:
Both biotic and abiotic indicators have been used to describe marine habitat quality. These include: the presence of characteristic species as well as those which are sensitive to the pressures the habitat may face; water quality parameters; levels of exposure to particular pressure, and more integrated indices which describe habitat structure and function, such as trophic index, or successional stages of development in habitats that have a natural cycle of change over time. There are no commonly agreed indicators of quality for this habitat, although particular parameters may have been set in certain situations e.g. protected features within Natura 2000 sites, where reference values have been determined and applied on a location-specific basis. Diversity, abundance and biomass of fauna are suggested quality parameters including the presence of seapens which are both characterstic of this habitat and vulnerable to the most significant pressures.
Threat status
Synthesis of Red List assessment
The overall assessment for this EUNIS level 4 habitat has been based on the HELCOM (2013) assessments for the associated HELCOM HUB biotopes. Draft assessments were derived using a weighted approach whereby the HELCOM assessment outcomes were assigned a score. This was averaged across the relevant biotopes. The outcomes were reviewed by Baltic experts to reach a final conclusion. HELCOM (2013) assessed this habitat as Endangered on the basis of a decline in quantity over the last 50 years. Its restricted distribution, clustered location, and likely continuing decline in quantity and quality means that for the current assessment expert opinion is that this habitat should be considered to be Endangered for the EU 28. It is not present and has therefore not been assessed for EU 28+.
EU | |
Red List Category | Red List Criteria |
Endangered | A1,B1,B2,B3 |
Europe | |
Red List Category | Red List Criteria |
Endangered | A1,B1,B2,B3 |
Confidence in the assessment
Pressures and threats
- Biological resource use other than agriculture & forestry
- Fishing and harvesting aquatic resources
- Professional active fishing
- Benthic or demersal trawling
- Benthic dredging
- Pollution
- Pollution to surface waters (limnic, terrestrial, marine & brackish)
- Nutrient enrichment (N, P, organic matter)
- Natural System modifications
- Human induced changes in hydraulic conditions
- Siltation rate changes, dumping, depositing of dredged deposits
- Dumping, depositing of dredged deposits
- Other siltation rate changes
Habitat restoration potential
Trends in extent |
|
Average current trend in quantity |
|
Decreasing | Decreasing |
EU28 | EU28+ |
Trends in quality |
|
Average current trend in quality |
|
Decreasing | Decreasing |
EU28 | EU28+ |
Conservation and management needs
List of conservation and management needs
- Measures related to wetland, freshwater and coastal habitats
- Restoring/Improving water quality
- Measures related to spatial planning
- Establish protected areas/sites
- Measures related to hunting, taking and fishing and species management
- Regulation/Management of fishery in marine and brackish systems
- Measures related to special resouce use
- Other resource use measures
Distribution
Geographic occurrence and trends
Seas | Present or presence uncertain | Current area of habitat (Km2) | Recent trend in quantity (last 50 years) | Recent trend in quality (last 50 years) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Belt Sea | Present | max | Decreasing | Decreasing |
The Sound |
Extent of Occurrence, Area of Occupancy and habitat area
Extent of Occurrence (EOO) (Km2) | Area of Occupancy (AOO) | Current estimated Total Area | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|
EU28 | 2,800 | 19 | max 1900 | Based on presence in 100 x 100km grid squares therefore maximum potential EOO and AOO |
EU28+ | 19 | max 1900 | Based on presence in 100 x 100km grid squares therefore maximum potential EOO and AOO |
EOO = the area (km2) of the envelope around all occurrences of a habitat (calculated by a minimum convex polygon).