Annual algae communities on Baltic infralittoral coarse sediment
Quick facts
Red List habitat type | code BAL14 |
---|---|
Threat status | |
Europe | Least Concern |
EU | Least Concern |
Relation to |
|
Source | European Red List habitat factsheet |
European Red List of habitats reports | |
European Red List of habitats (Excel table) |
Summary
This benthic habitat is distributed in the photic zone with at least 90% coverage of coarse sediment. Coarse sediment has less than 20% of mud/silt/clay fraction (<63 µm), and the proportion of gravel and pebbles (grain size 2–63 mm) exceeds 30% of the combined gravel and sand fraction according to the HELCOM HUB classification. Annual algae cover at least 10% of the bottom, while all other epibenthic biotic structures like perennial algae, rooted plants or blue mussels cover less than 10%. The habitat is present in the full salinity range of the Baltic Sea and is more common in exposed areas, mainly within the surf zone, in which wave energy prevents the establishment of either perennial vegetation or blue mussels.
One associated biotope has been identified: ‘Baltic photic coarse sediment dominated by Chorda filum and/or Halosiphon tomentosus’ (AA.I1S2). This is encountered in the Baltic Sea up to the Quark, and is identified by a large representation of Chorda filum and/or Halosiphon tomentosus, at least 50% of the biovolume of annual algae.
Indicators of quality:
The ratio of annual to perennial epibenthic components is used in several countries to describe habitat quality. As such the area of the habitat itself or the biomass of the corresponding species is used as an indicator for quality.In this particular case the lowest area or biomass is a sign of high quality as only in very high exposure levels should annual algae dominate. In all other circumstances perennials (Fucus) should dominate except where there is a low salinity (below 3 psu) as perennial algae growth does not generally occur under such conditions.
Threat status
Synthesis of Red List assessment
The overall assessment for this EUNIS level 4 habitat has been based on the HELCOM (2013) assessments for the associated HELCOM HUB biotopes. Draft assessments were derived using a weighted approach whereby the HELCOM assessment outcomes were assigned a score. This was averaged across the relevant biotopes. The outcomes were reviewed by Baltic experts to reach a final conclusion.HELCOM (2013) assessed the relevant Baltic biotope (AA.I1S2) as Least Concern (A1). With no additional information on changes in extent or quality of this habitat, the current expert opinion is an assessment of Least Concern for the EU 28 and EU 28+.
EU | |
Red List Category | Red List Criteria |
Least Concern | - |
Europe | |
Red List Category | Red List Criteria |
Least Concern | - |
Confidence in the assessment
Pressures and threats
- No threats or pressures
- No threats or pressures
Habitat restoration potential
Trends in extent |
|
Average current trend in quantity |
|
Stable ![]() |
Stable ![]() |
EU28 | EU28+ |
Trends in quality |
|
Average current trend in quality |
|
Stable ![]() |
Stable ![]() |
EU28 | EU28+ |
Conservation and management needs
List of conservation and management needs
- No measures
- No measure known / impossible to carry out specific measures
Distribution
Geographic occurrence and trends
Seas | Present or presence uncertain | Current area of habitat (Km2) | Recent trend in quantity (last 50 years) | Recent trend in quality (last 50 years) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Baltic Proper | Present | Unknown | Stable | Stable |
Belt Sea | ||||
Gulf of Bothnia | ||||
Gulf of Finland | ||||
Gulf of Riga | ||||
The Sound |
Extent of Occurrence, Area of Occupancy and habitat area
Extent of Occurrence (EOO) (Km2) | Area of Occupancy (AOO) | Current estimated Total Area | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|
EU28 | 742,934 | 455 | Unknown | This habitat is present in all the Baltic sub-basins. |
EU28+ | >50 | Unknown | This habitat is present in all the Baltic sub-basins |
EOO = the area (km2) of the envelope around all occurrences of a habitat (calculated by a minimum convex polygon).
Characteristic species
Legal status
Relation to other habitat types mentioned in legal instruments
Legal text | Annex | Name in legal text | Code in legal text |
Habitat type relationship |
More information |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora - consolidated version 01/01/2007 | Annex I: natural habitat types of community interest whose conservation requires the designation of special areas of conservation | Large shallow inlets and bays | 1160 | Overlap | http://ec.europa.eu/environm...rective/index_en.htm |